Traditional testing methods stifling creativity
Dear Editor,
The idea that all subjects and courses must be rigorously tested at every level of the education system is stifling the creativity of our students.
It is a known fact that standardised testing is not the most effective way to build core competencies in our children, yet we continue to use this outdated model that causes students to doubt their abilities.
While it is undoubtedly important to assess a child’s progress and provide timely feedback, our society is moving away from simply having students write elaborate papers or recall information spoken by a teacher through monthly tests, midterm exams, end-of-term exams, end-of-year exams, and exit profile exams. Our students are creative, curious problem-solvers who, if given the time along with supervision and monitoring, can accomplish tasks in ways we might not expect.
Let us consider this from a logical perspective. Our society has become increasingly technological, demonstrating skills and competencies is where most industries and professions are heading. Therefore, we need to brainstorm alternative methods of testing to assess and evaluate learning. Simple approaches such as projects, posters, songs, guided discoveries, and presentations are effective ways to assess knowledge. Studies have shown that project-based learning (PBL) significantly enhances critical thinking skills, promotes collaboration, and develops real-world applications of knowledge.
PBL refers to two similar but distinct approaches in education: project-based learning and problem-based learning.
•Project-based learning: This method emphasises students engaging in long-term projects that address real-world problems, with the teacher acting as a guide. Students are given opportunities to present their findings in various ways that showcase their creativity.
•Problem-based learning: This approach focuses on students solving open-ended problems, with the challenge serving as a driving force. Students learn by finding ways to solve complex problems within the classroom.
Both approaches are student-centred, promoting collaboration and the development of critical thinking. While project-based learning emphasises presenting findings, problem-based learning focuses on solving problems. Both methods can be crucial for developing our students in Jamaican society, especially if implemented effectively.
Although traditional testing may still be useful in some cases, over-reliance on this approach can lead to anxiety and phobias, resulting in poorer performance and outcomes at the exit level. As a nation let us consider alternative forms of assessment to enhance learning.
Ricardo Smith
Senior educator and social scientist
ricardo.professional.edu@gmail.com