CXC 2020 results: 18 + 52 = 4
On September 22, 2020 the Caribbean Examinations Council (CXC ) released the 2020 Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Examinations (CAPE) and Caribbean Secondary Education Certificate (CSEC) results. Of note, two information technology CAPE grades were compared. Student A received a grade one with a profile of C-D-C for (theory, productivity tools and programming, respectively), while Student B received a grade two with a profile of A-A-C.
This discrepancy is but one of several inconsistencies arising from this year’s CAPE and CSEC results.
Business, Latest News
March 24, 2025
KINGSTON, Jamaica — The US dollar on Monday, March 24, ended trading at $157.76 up by thirteen cents according to the Bank of Jamaica’s daily exchange...
In August, CXC’s registrar sought to assure candidates, their parents, prospective universities, and employers who rely on the integrity of the examining body, that the results from the new exam format would be “valid, equivalent and fair”. However, in light of the anomalies, all stakeholders need to consider whether or not this is truly the case.
Prior to the start of the exams, CXC introduced a revised examination strategy in which school-based assessments (SBAs) or internal assessments (IAs) along with one common paper, Paper 1, would be administered to determine students’ final grades. Paper 2 would not be administered. But critical to note, the registrar emphasised the weighting of the other components would remain the same. That being said, what other meaning could anyone derive from that? Implicitly, that statement suggested the marking scheme, pass mark, and profiles would remain the same. Therefore, if CXC actually used another construct to produce final grades it would amount to being disingenuous and could jeopardise its integrity.
Athletics, Sports
March 24, 2025
A third-straight global silver medal in the men’s long jump by Wayne Pinnock, a maiden global medal in the women’s sprint hurdles by Ackera Nugent, an...
After the exams were administered, the CXC registrar again addressed stakeholders emphasising the need for equivalence; that is, ensuring that each year “candidates who earn the same grade demonstrate the same level of performance”. In other words, if every year approximately 50 per cent of Jamaican students pass CSEC mathematics, then this year, no matter how easy the exam, grades must reflect the same 50 per cent, plus or minus a few percentage points. And if they don’t, they will be manipulated until they do. But why wasn’t this communicated to candidates prior to the sitting of the exams? It would certainly have provided an opportunity for parents who were uncomfortable to consider their options. The truth is, equivalence cannot truly exist in this year’s exams because Paper 2 was not assessed. It is this paper that best demonstrates students’ level of reasoning and use of knowledge. Moreover, the 2020 exam was administered during a pandemic, an unprecedented era; can CXC quantify the true impact of that type of atmosphere on their candidates and their performance? Or are they more concerned that a sharp increase in grades one or two arising from students sitting Paper 1 only would damage the credibility of their examination body?
Last week, the CXC Registrar Dr Wayne Wesley was interviewed on Beyond the Headlines. Responding to concerns about student expectation not matching the grades they had received, he explained that students could not know their final SBA scores as they were all moderated. Every single SBA and IA was moderated by CXC. Has anyone ever picked up a lab book, per se, for CSEC chemistry and examined the 20-plus labs; each with tables, graphs, calculations, etc? It is no easy task to peruse all of those lab books, and if indeed they had the manpower to recheck and recalculate every one of them, why didn’t they allow the students to sit their Paper 2 then? One of the reasons given for omitting that paper was the lengthy marking process.
Latest News, News
March 24, 2025
ST MARY, Jamaica — The police are now investigating the shooting death of popular St Ann businessman Samuel “Fraughty” Dixon at his home in Tower Isle...
CXC’s website does not provide any information about pass marks or the percentile range associated with each grade which would enable candidates to readily quantify what a specific grade represents. However, it has long been believed that a grade one is awarded for scores ranging from a minimum of about 70 per cent or 75 per cent of the sum of all papers and SBAs combined. This year, rumour has it that CXC increased the pass mark by shifting the percentile ranges upwards for each grade. But what specific percentile range constituted each grade level for the 2020 CSEC and CAPE exams? Were all multiple choice items equally weighted? How was ‘the trend’ in teachers’ predictions used, if any at all, to determine a student’s final grade? A student who got 18/20 for her SBA, and projected she got at least 52/60 on Paper 1, how does that student end up with a grade four? There are too many unknown factors. It’s like students signed an agreement without knowing its terms and conditions. Transparency is lacking.
Last month, there was a similar uproar from British students relating to the manner by which the examining body OFQUAL (Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation in England) arrived at their final grades. The calculated grades based on a mathematical model were eventually abandoned and replaced with teacher-predicted grades. Important to note, upon making the change, OFQUAL acknowledged that some students’ grades would have been lowered. So, to resolve same, they advised all the stakeholders that students were allowed to retain the higher of the two grades. The point is, the examining body exercised leniency and flexibility.
Students did not bring this pandemic on themselves. They did not choose to sit Paper 1 only. They complied at every point of the process and, in the best interest of transparency, credibility and integrity, the region’s examination body needs to reassess the grades they awarded. That is fairness!
The confidence of our 2020 candidates must not suffer at the hands of the region’s examination mogul. Their hard work must be properly compensated and not merely skewed to fit on a curve so as to maintain equivalence. As parents, we welcome the news that an independent team will be addressing the concerns of our children. We trust that the Minister of Education Fayval Williams will be resolute in her quest to unearth the real grades that students received prior to the adjustment for equivalence. The 2020 candidates revised numerous past papers with their teachers. They went into those exams prepared and executed. At no time can 18 + 52 be a grade four. CXC, please give them their due.
bergirls@hotmail.com
