This is the first in a two-part piece by Dr Chris Davis in his effort to expose truths.

I sincerely thank the readers for the positive responses to my concerns raised about this column. I believe at this time, in good faith, I will continue to educate the public and bring whatever truth I may to interested readers. I will bring solid, natural care choices to the people, but I will also be revealing some things behind “traditional” models of care and common dangers that present themselves in almost every household on a daily basis.

People commonly present to my office who have been suffering for months or even years. When I ask them what took them so long to get natural care, almost without fail, they say, “My medical doctor advised against it”, or “My surgeon told me it was dangerous”, or “my medical doctor does not believe in chiropractic and told me not to come”.

It is a disservice to use lies and fear tactics on the public to prevent earnest care options. Now, I will begin to expose the inherent dangers of drugs — both prescription and over-the-counter — and surgeries, which are toxic, dangerous and invasive without a doubt, and I will attempt to offer valid, safer choices. Mainstream medical and pharmaceutical companies will not be very amicable with what I will be doing, but those who truly care about people and use their practice to help the sick, will have no reason to fear my words. I do this for the regular man.

The honest medical doctors will be valuable colleagues in my quest (hopefully, our joint quest) to truly do some good for every person that presents to us for help. That is our duty, our mission, as well as our responsibility to the public. I am just a voice in this wilderness, but when a few voices are combined and raised, there is strength. Ideas are bulletproof, prevailing even when man does not.

I have never found anyone to successfully disprove the truths that I write or speak about. Instead, for the few who attempt, I usually see personal attacks regurgitating popular beliefs, using flawed circular reasoning. I must remind you that anyone can be sincerely wrong, actually believing what they are saying or “defending”; nonetheless, they are, in fact, wrong. Allow me to give just one example of this: Whether you are “religious” or not makes no difference to the fact that there will always be debates over “old” and “new” accounts of religion, much like arguments for “traditional” and “alternative” health care. The simple fact is that regardless of the persuasive argument in either direction, the unadulterated truth usually lies somewhere in-between. Also, be aware that there are always three sides to any account: one side, the other side, and the whole truth. With your health, it is wise to err on the side of natural, rather than invasive.

Let us take, for example purposes only, the Ten Commandments. Now, this is not a religious argument about who may be “right” or “wrong” about that set of statutes. And let’s be honest, that is what they are. A set of morals to either choose to live by, or not. But, even in a civil or criminal sense, if one chooses incorrectly, there will be consequences. To simply say one is able to perform immoral acts because they believe they are “forgiven”, or to say that they are not under any obligation to be moral, but just have to “believe”, is ludicrous. Neither argument is complete. Try that in any court in any nation and you will quickly find the mortal judge is not so tolerant or forgiving of your crimes. Bear in mind, a supreme spiritual judge is much more perfect and just. The crime must be punished. The one who is “right” is the one who does least harm, or, no harm at all.

On the other hand, it is also incorrect to think that anyone can be perfect at all times. Even “good” people who do “bad” things will pay the price eventually. That is just the nature of morality — especially if there is intent. And morality is pretty simple to abide by, for it can basically be summed up in one sentence: Do not do anything to anyone else that you would not be comfortable with experiencing yourself. It could also be summed up with loving one another, even those you find it difficult to love, because it is extremely difficult to harm someone you love. But I am not speaking of just “love” itself. Anyone can claim to or say they “love” anything, even material objects. And trust me, criminals love crime and thieves love money, yet that does not make crime or money righteous in any form of the word. Likewise, it does not necessarily make the money evil, for the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil, not the money itself. Remember that the next time they try to read you something different in their interpretation and then relieve you of your money in the collection plate.

Now, regardless of your faith, denomination, or any other superficial, politically correct and socially acceptable views, it all boils down to one thing and applies to all aspects of human life. Is it moral, or not? Anyone can make logical fallacies on either side of the fence. What everyone seems to be missing here is: does it make sense and agree with your conscience (which means, “with knowledge”)?

Absolutely every human being with a conscience knows it is immoral to lie, to steal and to kill. There is no argument there. It is inherently inarguable. So, people are skilled in attacking with attempts of misdirection and logical fallacy, which is inherently illogical. Who cares if it is “old” or “new”? Who cares if it means you are a certain religion or not? Isn’t the relationship the weightier matter here? What we as human beings should actually care about and not be distracted from is if it is right, or wrong. After all, virtually every religion in the world has this in common, whether it be Catholicism/Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Atheism, Satanism, Scientology, Medicine, or whatever else. They all believe that theirs is right and that all others

are wrong, and others will therefore suffer the consequences.

What you must ask your doctors to break the cycle is specifically, would they inject their own child or even themselves, dosage adjusted to their own body weight of course, with the same substance they are pushing onto you or your child. Then you know if they are doing harm or not. I adjust my child regularly, so that should lend credit to the gentleness and effectiveness of my technique.

The youngest and oldest members of any society, even if devoid from any religion, know in their deepest consciences that they should not lie to, steal from or kill another human being. It is that simple. Religious and social factions muck the simple up into a distorted, controversial debate between “beliefs” and “teachings”, or precepts or dogmas of men. We could simply avoid all of the smoke and mirrors by listening to our consciences and doing what is right, not doing what is morally wrong. What kind of God would have any issues with that? And what kind of God would scold you for trusting in Him and the body he gave you to heal you, rather than putting your trust in men or potions? I am speaking to your conscience right now. That is why you have no rebuttal. I am circumventing your logical reasoning, or intellect, which has been so conditioned by societies and governments, religions, institutions, and elite entities that you are probably confounded right now, because though you have been brainwashed into contesting other views and defending “your own views” and unknowingly defending the “establishment” itself (the real reason it gave you “your” views), you can’t figure out why you are unable to rebut at this very moment. I will tell you why. It is no secret, except from you: Because, it is impossible. You have been duped into believing what they want you to believe, and not in the truth. They have sold you the lie, and you are a good little soldier.

You may be realising right about now that they have not given you any actual bullets or ammunition, and that there really is no war, yet, you keep “fighting the good fight”. Is there really such a thing? It is certainly an oxymoron.

That being said, absolutely all attacks and resistance to natural, effective, safe, and non-invasive care of the human body are futile. All the science and knowledge and degrees in the world cannot defeat pure and simple, commonsensical, God-given wisdom, and results speak for themselves. Anyone can claim that natural chiropractic care doesn’t work, won’t help, doesn’t make any sense, or that they don’t believe in it; however, that does not make their words true. They can also claim that it will “harm” you, hiding behind the false “do no harm” adage, but there again, accusations are hardly reliable when shone in the light of truth and actuality. Yes, they may not “believe” in it, but that only means that they are either ignorant to the fact of its successes or cognsant, and withholding it from you, which is even worse. Ignorance is correctable. The only way to know for sure is to experience it for yourselves. Everything else is hearsay.

Don’t forget to “Ask Your Chiropractor” every week where your questions may be published and answered in subsequent articles. Address questions to: Dr Chris Davis, the Spinal Mechanic and lead doctor, at movethebone@gmail.com; or, Dr Michael Harvey, director, at dr.michael_harvey@yahoo.com